I disagree with this statement mainly because it twists the arguments of Occupy Wall Street and what it was intended for. While I am sure there are those that jumped on the bandwagon because they blame “The Man” for all of their problems and poor choices. But there are those that have legitimate reasons to take part in this movement and making a hasty generalization based on what the media spoon feeds you is problematic.
Taking the major premise that you read an article or saw a news report showing Occupy Wall Street participants complaining about student loan debt, then going off the minor premise that you are part of the minority with the luxury of being debt free due to “hard work” in order to lead to the conclusion that Occupy Wall Street protest participants are nothing but college kids with privilege whining about their debt and poor decisions is not an absolute truth, but a faulty categorical syllogism at best. Furthermore, not all debt is the result of poor decisions but rather, a consequence of the system.
I will agree that perhaps the original goals of this movement have been submerged through the few bandwagoneers and the media’s interpretation. The true meaning is best described as the following: “Occupy Wall Street deals with the very material consequences of corporate collapse in the last five years. People who ‘worked hard’ lost their jobs and their savings.” So, the Occupy Movement in all reality has NOTHING to do with student loan debt. It’s that the priveleged benefiting from big corporations are feeding off of the demise of those beneath them. It’s about bringing awareness and expressing outrage regarding these practices.
Thus, I feel there are genuine and legitimate reasons to take action through protest in order to enact change. THIS is the 99%
Photo taken by: Katia Roberts